South Dakota governor vetoes bill that would have restricted transgender studentsf access to school restrooms
By Emma Brown
March 1 at 6:14 PM - The Washington Post
South Dakota Gov. Dennis Daugaard (R) has vetoed a bill that would have been
the first in the nation to restrict transgender studentsf access to school
restrooms and locker rooms, a move that came after LGBT-rights activists waged a
furious campaign against the measure.
In a message to state
lawmakers announcing his veto, Daugaard said that the bill would have
introduced a new statewide mandate that gdoes not address any pressing
issue concerning the school districts of South Dakota.h
gInstead of encouraging local solutions, this bill broadly regulates in a
manner that invites conflict and litigation, diverting energy and resources from
the education of the children of this state,h Daugaard wrote, emphasizing that
local school districts should be able to decide how to handle questions
about bathroom use without interference from the state or federal
government.
Daugaardfs decision came days after meeting with transgender youth to
hear their personal stories and their reasons for opposing the bill, which would
have required that students use the public school restrooms that correspond with
their biological sex instead of their gender identity. Transgender
students would have been allowed under the bill to ask their schools for
greasonable accommodations,h such as a single-stall teacherfs
bathroom.
He announced the veto just hours before a deadline to act on the
bill.
Had it been enacted, the South Dakota law would have been in direct
conflict with federal civil rights policy, and schools could have faced the
possibility of losing millions of dollars in federal funding.
The president of the nationfs largest LGBT-rights organization cheered the
governorfs decision. gToday, the voices of fairness and equality prevailed, and
these studentsf rights and dignity prevailed against overwhelming odds and
vicious opponents in the state legislature,h said Chad Griffin, president of the
Human Rights Campaign.
Proponents of the legislation, including its sponsor, state Rep. Fred Deutsch
(R), say that it is necessary in order to protect the privacy of all
children in public schools.
gItfs about all the children that we have to protect from the opposite
biologic sex when theyfre young and vulnerable and impressionable,h Deutsch told
The Washington Post last week.
Deutsch did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday evening.
The state legislature could override the veto with a two-thirds majority vote,
according to the Argus
Leader newspaper in Sioux Falls.
The American Civil Liberties Union, the Human Rights Campaign and other
LGBT-rights activists had been fighting the South Dakota bill, calling
it a bigoted effort to target some of the countryfs most vulnerable
children. Some businesses and child-welfare groups also had voiced concern about
the measure.
gTransgender students like me are just looking for a chance to access the
same things that everyone else does — an education, a job, a safe place to pee,h
Thomas Lewis, an 18-year-old transgender South Dakotan, wrote in an opinion
piece published in The Post. gGov. Dennis Daugaard, please stand up for me
and all of the people of South Dakota you represent. The country is watching,
and history will show that you did the right thing if you veto this bad
bill.h
The Obama administration has said that restricting transgender studentsf
access to bathrooms amounts to gender discrimination that is illegal under the
federal civil rights law known as Title IX.
The administrationfs position, hailed by transgender students and their
advocates, has sparked a mounting backlash from parents, activists and lawmakers
who call it an assault on traditional values and childrenfs privacy.
Besides South Dakota, 13 other states are considering legislation that would
restrict transgender studentsf bathroom access.
Lawmakers in Tennessee were scheduled to hold a hearing Tuesday on a bill
that would require students to use the bathroom that corresponds to the sex
listed on their birth certificate. Tennessee is the only state in the nation
with a law banning people from changing the sex listed on their birth
certificate, according to the ACLU.
Emma Brown writes about national education
and about people with a stake in schools, including teachers, parents and
kids.